THIS IS A DRAFT POST -- A WORKING POST -- PLEASE DO NOT QUOTE, PRINT, COPY or Distribute.
Question: "Domestic Violence" and Right and Righteous and Virtuous and/or Justified?
ONe person said, "Maby they still just don't care..." (even if they hurt someone.)
"Some people just don't have remorse about what they've done."
Another person said, (Question, could you imaging someone not thinking it's the right thing to do..?
Response... "Still trying to put the blame on the other person. Just makes the situation worse.. because they are not holding themselves accountable."
CAN you imagine any time where it could be justified? ("No").
So if it cannot be justified ever?
(Does having a RIGHT to do something back to them in revenge -- make it the Right things to do? (No... You just shouldn't hit them even if it is in revenge because they hit your first.)
Two questions:
1. Why not hit them back? -- What are the possible PROS to NOT hitting them back?
If I dont hit back, "I don't have the risk of getting into trouble..." "If you hit them back there is no way to prove you hit them after they hit you... "
"Not to harm anybody because you shouild not hurt them anyways... not to harm the relationship... or harm anyonephysically."
2. But are there not any exceptions to this rule then?
"Maby it Could be justified if anotehr person is abuisve toward you and you hit them back... (for revenge, to protect yourself, get them to stop hurting you.. like if they are choking you.) So if you are in a situation that is Life or Death.... Or let's in a sitaution where serious bodily harm could happen... You would be defending yourself...
Question: "Could there be a better alternative to striking back?"
"Getting away.. of course... Like asking for help. (Embarrassment... Fear of Retaliation... or Fear of loss of the family together as a whole...)"
If there are kids around, you definitely need to go a different route:
1. Leaving the whole relationship so that you don't put your kids in danger..
2. And also again, asking for help.
Why would anyone say "yes" to this question -- again?
(Can Domestic Violence (ever) be Right? Can it ever be Virtuous or Righteous? Can Domestic Violence Ever Become the Right Thing To Do?)
Why would anyone say this is the Right thing to do?
Maby because -- "Maby becuse it is the only way they can get away from that person."
Perhaps, because he or she said they were going to hurt a child -- in the other room. And their their threats were believable.
Alternative Consideration:
"Domestic violence is never considered right, righteous, virtuous, or justified in modern society or under the law.
Legally, it is a recognized crime, such as under federal laws like the Violence Against Women Act, and is treated as an act of power and control." (Source).
Question:
How can something be RIGHTIOUS?
"Something is righteous when it aligns perfectly with moral perfection, justice, and truth. Depending on your framework, it can be defined in a few distinct ways:
Moral & Ethical Alignment: An action or concept is righteous if it upholds fairness, honesty, and the greater good without malice (i.e., without a reason to seek revenge) or hidden motives.
Through Faith and Grace: In many religious traditions, such as Christianity, humans cannot make themselves perfectly righteous on their own. Instead, righteousness is often viewed as a gift of grace or a restored relationship with the divine.
Living an Upright Life: In a practical sense, you pursue righteousness daily by acting justly, showing mercy, and living with integrity (Source)."
How can something be VIRTUOUS? (For example, if I hit someone back, can it be virtuious to do so?")
"Something is virtuous when it demonstrates high moral standards, righteousness, and a disposition to do what is right. In philosophy and psychology, it is typically achieved by consistently practicing positive moral traits, acting from good intentions, and cultivating balance in one's life.
Concepts that make something virtuous include:
The Doctrine of the Mean: Rooted in Aristotelian philosophy, virtue is often the balance between two extremes.
(For example, courage is the virtuous middle ground between cowardice (too little) and rashness (too much).)
Practical Wisdom: Known as phronesis, this involves navigating complex situations by accurately assessing what needs to be done and adjusting your actions with excellence.
(Question: "Did I act with practical wisdom on the day/night of my offense.")
Moral Character: Virtues aren't just one-off actions; they are internal dispositions. Qualities like honesty, compassion, integrity, and self-control become integrated into your daily habits. (Source)".
(Question: "Did I act with Moral Character on the day/night of my offense.")
But it is important to know that being morally incorrect does not mean that one is guilty. However, if one is indeed morally incorrect (or was when the event happened - like being drunk or seeking vengence), then it is EASIER to go ahead and believe are the guilty party.
Can Domestic Violence (ever) be Right? Can it ever be Virtuous or Righteous? Can Domestic Violence Ever Become the Right Think To Do?
""
""
""
""
v
v



